Mining & Hunter Risks

    Mining subsidence versus earthquake. Why does the difference matter in the Hunter?

    Back to Insights

    Written by Greg SmithDirector, Sequa Australia

    Published 12 August 2026

    Last reviewed 26 August 2026

    In the Hunter Region, ground movement can raise very different insurance questions. Mining subsidence and earthquake-related issues can be treated quite differently under a policy.

    The distinction matters because a policy may respond to one and not the other. Reading the wording carefully is the only way to understand where you stand.

    The short answer

    Mining subsidence refers to ground movement associated with mining activity. Earthquake cover relates to seismic events. They are not the same thing, and a policy can treat them differently.

    Why it matters

    In the Hunter, ground movement is a real consideration for many businesses and property owners. Assuming that one type of movement is covered because another is can lead to surprises at claim time.

    What you should consider

    Whether your location is in an area affected by mining activity. How your policy defines ground movement and subsidence. And whether any exclusions or conditions apply to your particular circumstances.

    When to speak with your broker

    If your property or business is in the Hunter and you are unsure how ground movement is treated under your policy, it is worth reviewing the wording before you need to rely on it.

    Related Sequa expertise

    Whether a specific circumstance is covered depends on the policy wording, activities, limits, exclusions, excesses and the individual situation. Speak with Sequa if you would like your circumstances reviewed.

    Have a question about your cover?

    Insurance can depend heavily on the details. Talk with Greg or Sinead about your circumstances and the questions you need answered.